
What drove the final decision in Alcala’s death sentence?
4.4 (42)
38 mins
Explore the chilling details of Alcala’s trial, where prosecutors tried to prove his guilt in a series of gruesome murders. Discover the legal battles and challenges as forensic evidence and witness testimonies linked him to multiple victims.
Ep 1:
Impact of Separating Alcala’s Murder Cases in Court
Ep 2:
How Did Prosecutor Satriano Build the Case Against Alcala?
Ep 3:
How Did Prosecution Present Alcala’s Brutal Crime Against a 12 Year Old?
Ep 4:
What Role Did Dana Crappa's Testimony Play in Alcala's Trial?
Ep 5:
Why Did Alcala Want to Represent Himself in Court?
Ep 6:
What Did the Judge Say After Sentencing Alcala to Death?
Ep 7:
What New Forensic Evidence Solidified Alcala’s Guilt?
Ep 8:
What Did the Court Psychiatrist Say About Alcala’s Mental Health?
Julian
Level 2 · 9 mo agoSo... Alcala really thought he could represent himself better than the lawyers? The reporter was right. He who represents himself has a fool for a client. His arrogance was his downfall...
Stephen
Level 8 · 8 mo agoCalling him strategic is giving him way too much credit.
Alan
Level 9 · 8 mo agoRepresenting himself? What a total arrogant prat!